<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hedging Options &#187; How To Trade Options</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hedgingoptions.net/tag/how-to-trade-options/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hedgingoptions.net</link>
	<description>Hedge your bets...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:38:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to Trade â Book Review &#8211; Kenneth L. Grant, Trading Risk</title>
		<link>http://hedgingoptions.net/how-to-trade-a%c2%80%c2%93-book-review-kenneth-l-grant-trading-risk</link>
		<comments>http://hedgingoptions.net/how-to-trade-a%c2%80%c2%93-book-review-kenneth-l-grant-trading-risk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Managing Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Option Trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hedgingoptions.net/how-to-trade-a%c2%80%c2%93-book-review-kenneth-l-grant-trading-risk</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Managing the performance of your trading account must go beyond the discipline of money management. While money management remains critical, it is a subset of the total picture of managing your trading accountâs profit and loss.That total picture is what Kenneth L. Grant aptly paints in his book, Trading Risk.Â  Total performance management of trading [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Managing the performance of your trading account must go beyond the discipline of money management. While money management remains critical, it is a subset of the total picture of managing your trading accountâs profit and loss.That total picture is what Kenneth L. Grant aptly paints in his book, Trading Risk.Â  Total performance management of trading must treat the profit and losses in a trading account at 2 levels â the portfolio level and at the individual trade level. Kenneth L. Grant is Cheyne Capitalâs Global Risk Manager and notable pioneer in designing risk control and capital allocation programs for global hedge funds.Â  Typically with most literature on risk management, you would expect complex numerical formulas beyond the reach of most retail traders who do not have a mathematical background.Â  Kenneth writes in a style that does emphasize the robustness of arithmetical reasoning, but helps you visualize the various types of risks with ample graphs. The content is not so numerically oriented that it is beyond the grasp of anyone who is comfortable with Statistics 101.There are adequate reader reviews on Amazon and Google Book Search, to help you decide if you will get the book. For those who have just started or are about to read the book, Iâve summarized the core concepts in the larger and essential chapters to help you get through them quicker.The number on the right of the title of the chapter is the number of pages contained within that chapter. It is not the page number.Â  The percentages represent how much each chapter makes up of the 244 pages in total, excluding appendices.Chapter 1:Â  The Risk Management Investment.Â  18,Â  7.38%.Chapter 2:Â  Setting Performance Objectives.Â  18,Â  7.38%.Chapter 3:Â  Understanding the Profit/Loss Patterns over Time.Â  44,Â  18.03%.Chapter 4:Â  The Risk Components of an Individual Portfolio.Â  28,Â  11.48%.Chapter 5:Â  Setting Appropriate Exposure Levels (Rule 1).Â  24,Â  9.84%.Chapter 6:Â  Adjusting Portfolio Exposure (Rule 2).Â  22,Â  9.02%.Chapter 7:Â  The Risk Components of an Individual Trade.Â  58,Â  23.77%.Chapter 8:Â  Bringing It on Home.Â  32,Â  13.11%.Focus on chapters 2, 3, 4 and 7, which makes up about 61% of the book. These chapters are relevant for practical trading purposes.Â  Here are the key points for these focus chapters, which Iâm summarizing from a retail option traderâs perspective. Chapter 2: Setting Performance Objectives. There are 3 types of targets to set at the portfolio level. </p>
<p>Chapter 3: Understanding the Profit/Loss Patterns over Time. This chapter evaluates the profit and loss in terms of Time Units (typically day and week) feeding into Time Spans, Average Profit versus Average Loss, Standard Deviation, Sharpe Ratio, Median P/L, Percentage of Winning Days versus Losing Days, Drawdown and Correlation Analysis. This section focuses on the core metrics of trade performance, for a given period: </p>
<p>In calculating the metrics, it becomes clear if your strengths are in trading long debit spreads, short credit spreads, directional trades (be it up/down) or non-directional trades. Trade in line with what you are intuitively profitable at, be that debit/credit spreads or directional/non-directional trades. The metrics help you guard against trading counter-intuitively in opposition to your strengths. Chapter 4: The Risk Components of an Individual Portfolio. The emphasis of this chapter is on Historical Volatility, Correlation and Implied Volatility and Value at Risk (VaR). While it is educational to understand how these various risks can be aggregated up into a single, portfolio measure of exposure, it is not useful for option traders trading retail portfolios from home.Â  Why?Â  To re-simulate the test scenarios on the portfolio cited in the text, requires specific types of data. The Account Statement of most retail option trading platforms only record each tradeâs profit, loss and date. The additional data of each dayâs Historical Volatility, Implied Volatility, Correlation coefficient values and Standard Deviation/Variance values will need to be sourced from outside the trading platform.Â  Unless you are trading multiple portfolios on behalf of other individuals, VaR simulations make sense. If you are trading just your own portfolio, it more useful to get an Implied Volatility tool that forecasts IV rising or falling by X% over 30-60-90-120 days.Â  This is a much more affordable way to assess the total impact of IV and Correlation in IV on your portfolio.Chapter 7: The Risk Components of an Individual Trade. The section to focus on here is the Core Transaction-Level Statistics. This includes the Trade Level P/L, Holding Period, Average P/L, Weighted Average P/L, Average Holding Period, P/L by Security or Asset Class and Long Side P/L versus Short Side P/L.Â  The main point here is to monetize the Average Holding Period of a long or short position. For example, as a guideline: </p>
<p>In conclusion, the critical points to focus on are the 3 types of targets at the portfolio level, the core metrics of trade performance, identifying your intuitive trading orientation and monetizing the average holding period of long and short trades for efficient trade turnover.Â  Translating these specific elements of trading risk into methods you can rely on every day, builds the required consistency in the profit and loss of your trading account. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hedgingoptions.net/how-to-trade-a%c2%80%c2%93-book-review-kenneth-l-grant-trading-risk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Trade Options â Diversified Trading Stock Options but Still Suffering Concentration Risk</title>
		<link>http://hedgingoptions.net/how-to-trade-options-a%c2%80%c2%93-diversified-trading-stock-options-but-still-suffering-concentration-risk</link>
		<comments>http://hedgingoptions.net/how-to-trade-options-a%c2%80%c2%93-diversified-trading-stock-options-but-still-suffering-concentration-risk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset Allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Option Trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hedgingoptions.net/how-to-trade-options-a%c2%80%c2%93-diversified-trading-stock-options-but-still-suffering-concentration-risk</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Applying a more complete definition of diversification can help retail option traders diversify their portfolio profitably, beyond equities.A buddy started online options trading from home, in the last 6 months. He was trading a mix of Verticals, Calendars and Iron Condors using highly liquid Indexes but was failing to get consistent profits.Â  Naturally, I asked, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Applying a more complete definition of diversification can help retail option traders diversify their portfolio profitably, beyond equities.A buddy started online options trading from home, in the last 6 months. He was trading a mix of Verticals, Calendars and Iron Condors using highly liquid Indexes but was failing to get consistent profits.Â  Naturally, I asked, âWhich Indexes?âHe answered, âDJX, DIA, MNX, QQQQ, RUT, SMH, SPY and XSP.Â  Iâve incorporated broad-based Indexing across large, mid and small-cap stocks to remove single stock exposure.Â  Having learnt how to trade options with Verticals, Calendars and Iron Condors, Iâm spreading across these various Indexes. Iâm being careful with money management, 2%-5% per trade, Iâve diversified risk, yes?âNo. He has partially diversified a portion within his portfolio; but, is still suffering concentration risk.Â  All he has really done is allocate capital across multiple products, using various option spread types; yet, all his trading capital is stuck in equities.In choosing the MNX, QQQQ, SMH, SPY and XSP, there is a duplication of stock components in these Indexes: for example, AMAT (Applied Materials) is a component of all 5 Indexes.Â  Bear in mind the MNX and the QQQQ are both smaller versions of the Nasdaq100 Index, the only difference being the MNX is an European styled cash settled Index and the cubes (QQQQ) is an American style stock settled Index.Â  Another example, Apple (AAPL) is a component of the MNX/QQQQ and SPY/XSP &#8211; both the SPY and the XSP track the S&amp;P 500, the SPY is American style stock settled and the XSP is European style cash settled.Â  Duplication is not diversification.Â  Even if you allocated capital to the smaller versions of the Dow: DJX, the European style cash settled version of the DIA which is the American style stock settled version.Â  Moreover, if you extended capital allocation to trade the RUT, thinking you are diversifying into small-cap stocks and away from large-caps, you just sunk more of your trading capital into equities.Â  Again, you cannot achieve diversification by adding more capital in the same asset class.Â  That is concentration risk in stocks. Do not confuse asset category (market capitalization) with asset class.Why bother diversifying across Asset Classes? To answer this question, Iâll use an example of a well known traded stock:Â  Apple (AAPL).Â  You wonât need to understand Fundamental Analysis to follow the reasoning.Summarizing a financial extract from its Annual Report, Apple has almost ~30% of its Net Sales distributed across: UK, France, Germany, Spain &amp; Ireland and Japan.Â  Appleâs customers in Europe are paying in EUR/GBP and customers in Japan will be paying in JPY.Â  Even though you are trading Apple directly as a US parented firm listed in the US and the currency of the parent is USD denominated, the company has currency exposure to the EUR/GBP and JPY arising from operating sales entities in those jurisdictions.Â  So, you are already exposed to currency and geographic risks by choosing Apple as a product to trade, even though you are constructing an option trade on the stock.So, it makes sense, rather than have these exposures wrapped inside the stock, where you are subordinating non-equity risks to the stock, to deliberately surface the risks in Geography, Commodities and Currencies.Â  Then, isolate these elements and trade them directly using optionable Geographic ETFs, Commodity ETFs and Currency ETFs.Is there an example of a consistently profitable and diversified portfolio to see the merits of trading options beyond equities? Yes.Â  Follow the link below, entitled âConsistent Resultsâ to learn how to trade options using a multi-asset class set up.Â  Notice how the profits step up gradually, from the mid hundreds to the higher hundreds; then, from the higher hundreds into the thousands.Â  While, the losses are contained within the mid to lower hundreds.Â  Diversification to trade options in non-stock asset classes using Geographic ETFs, Commodity ETFs and Currency ETFs, deliberately dilutes the concentration risk in the portfolioâs P/L.If you are puzzled, yet intrigued, you may well ask, âI donât need to Beta-weight the Deltas of my option positions; then, hedge using Futures?Â  Do I need to adjust my existing positions by embedding single options; or, morph the original spread into a hybrid option strategy?âNo, is the answer to both questions. Just as it would not make sense within stocks to say Beta-weight a company like GE to the SMH (Semiconductors Holdrs), there is even less sense to Beta-weight a broad-based Index like the SPY to an Emerging Market ETF, Commodity ETF or Currency ETF.Â  Diversification is designed to break the commonality in correlation between the asset price movements of products, in the retail traderâs portfolio structured for online options trading.Â  Adjustments fail to provide the consistency in laddering up the profits as seen in the portfolio, because an adjusted trade often fails to restore, let alone improve the original profile of the tradeâs volatility and probability that was bought or sold.How is this possible? Volatility can be added to/reduced from the portfolio, as not all Asset Classes or Sectors or Individual Companies or Countries move up/down in value ALL at the same time; and/or, ALL at the same rate. It is the volatility level across various asset classes that is targeted for diversification.To conclude, hereâs the point to reflect on.Â  While diversification alone does not guarantee a profitable portfolio, do you think you are diversified trading stock options but still suffering concentration risk? Think deeper. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hedgingoptions.net/how-to-trade-options-a%c2%80%c2%93-diversified-trading-stock-options-but-still-suffering-concentration-risk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Options Trading Strategies â Intermarket Analysis in Brief for Retail Asset Allocation</title>
		<link>http://hedgingoptions.net/options-trading-strategies-a%c2%80%c2%93-intermarket-analysis-in-brief-for-retail-asset-allocation</link>
		<comments>http://hedgingoptions.net/options-trading-strategies-a%c2%80%c2%93-intermarket-analysis-in-brief-for-retail-asset-allocation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset Allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intermarket Analysis.intermarket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Option Trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hedgingoptions.net/options-trading-strategies-a%c2%80%c2%93-intermarket-analysis-in-brief-for-retail-asset-allocation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are trading a mix of Verticals, Calendars and Iron Condors across highly liquid indexes like the DJX, DIA, MNX, QQQQ, RUT, SMH, SPY and XSP, is your trading risk adequately diversified? No.In choosing the MNX, QQQQ, SMH, SPY and XSP, there is a duplication of stock components in these Indexes: for example, AMAT [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are trading a mix of Verticals, Calendars and Iron Condors across highly liquid indexes like the DJX, DIA, MNX, QQQQ, RUT, SMH, SPY and XSP, is your trading risk adequately diversified? No.In choosing the MNX, QQQQ, SMH, SPY and XSP, there is a duplication of stock components in these Indexes: for example, AMAT (Applied Materials) is a component of all 5 Indexes.Â  Bear in mind the MNX and the QQQQ are both smaller versions of the Nasdaq100 Index, the only difference being the MNX is an European styled cash settled Index and the cubes (QQQQ) is an American style stock settled Index.Â  Another example, Apple (AAPL) is a component of the MNX/QQQQ and SPY/XSP &#8211; both the SPY and the XSP track the S&amp;P 500, the SPY is American style stock settled and the XSP is European style cash settled.Â  Duplication is not diversification.Â  Even if you allocated capital to the smaller versions of the Dow: DJX, the European style cash settled version of the DIA which is the American style stock settled version.Â  Moreover, if you extended capital allocation to trade the RUT, thinking you are diversifying into small-cap stocks and away from large-caps, you just sunk more of your trading capital into equities.Â  Again, you cannot achieve diversification by adding more capital in the same asset class.Â  You need to learn how to trade options without concentration risk in stocks.Â  Do not confuse asset category (market capitalization) with asset class.This is where there is a need to understand Intermarket relationships.Â  Intermarket analysis requires the simultaneous analysis of 4 main Asset Classes: Currencies (U.S. Dollar remains most liquid of all major traded currencies), Commodities, Bonds and Stocks.Â  Synchronizing the rotation of asset allocation within your own portfolio lies in getting a grip on how these four markets interrelate with each other.Hereâs the synopsis of the relationships.Â  Commodities lead bonds, bonds lead stocks and stocks lead commodities.Â  The cycle holds true at least in a normal inflationary/disinflationary environment.Â  Other than itself, Commodities affects 2 markets (Bonds and Stocks); effectively, impacting 3 out of the 4 Intermarket relationships.Â  Even if you do not trade Commodity ETFs as part of your portfolio, you need to track Commodities as a leading economic cycle indicator.Â  The futures/Mini Futures that you see on news headlines/trading screens are relevant only as daily gauges for stock market behaviour.Â  They are not a cycle indicator across Asset Classes.So, you may already understand the criteria to define a &#8220;normal&#8221; economic cycle for the Directional Relationships to behave &#8220;ideally&#8221; (see below); BUT, how do you determine which Asset Class is driving the cycle? In other words, at a given point in the Intermarket cycle, how do you determine which Asset Class has the DOMINANT Relative Strength to trade? Follow the link below for a video-based course, to learn how Relative Strength &#8211; a rotational algorithmic measure is used to replace conventional Fundamental Analysis, as an asset allocation technique.Moving on, hereâs the Business Cycle in brief.Â  Bonds lead stocks, to trend in the same direction â except during deflation when bonds rise and stocks fall.Â  On average bonds are 18 months ahead of stocks in rising to their peak or falling to their bottoms; thereafter, stocks follow in the same direction.Â  If bonds have not broken down yet, this extends the gains in the stock market, acting as support for prevailing stock market levels.Â  The real risk begins to build 5-7 months after the bond market peaks or bottoms, thereafter the next 6 months stocks accelerate in the direction bonds have set.Typically, commodities and bonds have an inverse relationship: as commodities rise, bonds falls but as commodities fall, bonds rise. Inflationary expectations affect bond prices. US Dollar movements which is tied into Monetary Policy changes affects commodity prices.Â  Commodities lead bonds 12â18 months in advance (it takes this long for Monetary Policy to come into effect) and 24â27 months before the economy fully absorbs the policy changes.Now, the relationship between commodities and stocks. Stocks tend to lead commodities. Commodities are a hedge against inflation, with price inflation and higher inflation expectations occurring towards the end of the business cycle.Money and company growth using credit (loans) takes time to make its way through the economic system, from making prices rise to raising expectations on inflation. Thus, commodities usually outperform at the end of the business cycle.Rising bond prices generally raise stock prices in recovery, with falling commodity prices confirming an economic expansion phase is in play. As the expansion matures and begins to decelerate, watch for bonds to turn down first (as interest rates rise), followed by stocks.Finally, it is after commodities outperform stocks and start turning down, this signals the end of an economic expansion with the probable start of activity decelerating, then slipping into an impending recession.Retail traders can keep reading about the economics of interâmarket analysis and asset diversification. Though, they will not solve these key issues, every option trader trading with USD $25-$50K or less, must deal with for retail asset allocation purposes: </p>
<p>&#8230; if you can afford to diversify &#8230; </p>
<p>Where can I learn how to trade options profitably using Intermarket analysis with retail asset allocation methods? Follow the link below, entitled âConsistent Resultsâ to see a profitable retail option traderâs portfolio that is set up to cycle in and cycle out of Intermarket relationships, between asset classes.Why is it possible? Iâm using optionable ETFs (Commodity, Currency, Emerging Market and REIT), as well as optionable broad based/sector Equity Indexes, to trade the volatilities of each respective asset class. I do not need to trade Commodities and Currencies directly.Â  Remember, volatility can be added to/reduced from the portfolio, as not all Asset Classes or Sectors or Individual Companies or Countries move up/down in value ALL at the same time; and/or, ALL at the same rate. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hedgingoptions.net/options-trading-strategies-a%c2%80%c2%93-intermarket-analysis-in-brief-for-retail-asset-allocation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Options Trading Strategies &#8211; Book Review &#8211; Sheldon Natenberg, Option Volatility and Pricing</title>
		<link>http://hedgingoptions.net/options-trading-strategies-book-review-sheldon-natenberg-option-volatility-and-pricing</link>
		<comments>http://hedgingoptions.net/options-trading-strategies-book-review-sheldon-natenberg-option-volatility-and-pricing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Volatility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Option Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options Trading Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Natenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volatility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hedgingoptions.net/options-trading-strategies-book-review-sheldon-natenberg-option-volatility-and-pricing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As with most books on the topic of how to trade options, the amount of material to get through can be daunting. For example, with Sheldon Natenberg’s Option Volatility &#38; Pricing, it is about 418 pages to digest.  There are adequate reader reviews on Amazon and Google Book Search, to help you decide if you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with most books on the topic of how to trade options, the amount of material to get through can be daunting. For example, with Sheldon Natenberg’s Option Volatility &amp; Pricing, it is about 418 pages to digest.  There are adequate reader reviews on Amazon and Google Book Search, to help you decide if you will get the book. For those who have just started or are about to read the book, I’ve summarized the core concepts in the larger and essential chapters to help you get through them quicker.The number on the right of the title of the chapter is the number of pages contained within that chapter. It is not the page number.  The percentages represent how much each chapter makes up of the 418 pages in total, excluding appendices.1  The Language of Options.  12, 2.87%.2  Elementary Strategies.  22, 5.26%.3  Introduction to Theoretical Pricing Models.  16, 3.83%.4  Volatility.  30, 7.18%.5  Using an Option&#8217;s Theoretical Value.  14, 3.35%.6  Option Values and Changing Market Conditions.  32, 7.66%.7  Introduction to Spreading.  10, 2.39%.8  Volatility Spreads.  36, 8.61%.9  Risk Considerations.  26, 6.22%.10  Bull and Bear Spreads.  14, 3.35%.11  Option Arbitrage.  28, 6.70%.12  Early Exercise of American Options.  16, 3.83%.13  Hedging with Options.  16, 3.83%.14  Volatility Revisited.  28, 6.70%.15  Stock Index Futures and Options.  30, 7.18%.16  Intermarket Spreading.  22, 5.26%.17  Position Analysis.  32, 7.66%.18  Models and the Real World.  34, 8.13%.Focus on chapters 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15, 17 and 18, which makes up about 66% of the book.  These chapters are relevant for practical trading purposes. Here are the key points for these focus chapters, which I’m summarizing from a retail option trader’s perspective.4  Volatility. Volatility as a measure of speed in context of price in/stability for a given product in a particular market.  Despite its shortcomings, the definition of volatility still defaults to these assumptions of the Black-Scholes Model: 1. Price changes of  a product remain random and cannot be engineered, making it impossible to predict price direction prior to its movement. 2. Percent changes in the product’s price are normally distributed.  3. As the product’s price percent changes are counted as continuously compounded, the product’s price on expiry will become lognormally distributed.  4. The lognormal distribution’s mean (mean reversion) is to be found in the product’s forward price.6  Option Values and Changing Market Conditions.  Use of Delta in its 3 equivalent forms: Rate of Change, Hedge Ratio &amp; Theoretical Equivalent of the  Position.  Treatment of Gamma as an option&#8217;s curvature to explain the opposite relationship of OTM/ITM strikes to the ATM strike having the highest Gamma. Dealing with the Theta-Gamma inverse relationship, as well as Theta being intertwined synthetically as long decay and short premium with Implied Volatility, as measured by Vega.8  Volatility Spreads. Emphasis is on the sensitivities of a Ratio Back Spread, Ratio Vertical Spread, Straddle/Strangle, Butterfly, Calendar, and Diagonal to Interest Rates, Dividends and the 4 Greeks with specific attention on the effects of Gamma and Vega.9  Risk Considerations. A sobering reminder to select spreads with the lowest aggregate risk spread versus the highest probability of profit.  Aggregate Risk as measured in terms of Delta (Directional Risk), Gamma (Curvature Risk), Theta (Decay/Premium Risk) and Vega (Volatility Risk).11  Option Arbitrage. Synthetic positions are explained in terms of manufacturing an equivalent risk profile of the original spread, using a mix of single options, other spreads and the underlying product. Clear caution that transforming trades into Conversions, Reversals and Adjustments are not risk-free; but, may raise the trade&#8217;s nearer-term risks even though the longer-term net risk is lowered.  There are material differences in the cash flows of being long options versus short options, arising from the Skew bias unique to a product and the interest rate built into Calls making them disparate against Puts.14  Volatility Revisited.  Different expiry cycles between near-term versus longer-term options creates a longer-term volatility average, a mean volatility.   When volatility rises above its mean, there is relative certainty that it will revert to its mean. Likewise, mean reversion is highly likely as volatility drops below its mean. Gyration around the mean is an identifiable characteristic. Discernible volatility traits make it essential to forecast volatility in 30 day periods: 30-60-90-120 days, give the typical term to be short credit spreads between 30-45 and long debit spreads between 90-120 days.  Reconciling Implied Volatility as a measure of consensus volatility of all buyer/sellers for a given product, with inconsistencies in Historical Volatility and predictive constraints of Future Volatility.15  Stock Index Futures and Options. Effective use of Indexing to remove single stock risk.  Distinct treatment of the risks for stock-settled Indexes (including impact of dividend/exercise) separate from cash-settled Indices (absent of dividend/exercise).  Explains logic for Theoretically Pricing the options on Stock Index Futures, in addition to pricing the Futures contract itself, to determine which is economically viable to trade &#8211; the Futures contract itself or the options on the Futures.17  Position Analysis.  A more robust method than just eye balling the Delta, Gamma, Vega and Theta of a position is to use the relevant Theoretical Pricing model (Bjerksund-Stensland, Black-Scholes, Binomial) to scenario test for changes in dates (daily/weekly) before expiration, % changes in Implied Volatility and price changes within and near +/- 1 Standard Deviation. These factors feeding the scenario tests, once graphed, reveal the relative ratios of Delta/Gamma/Vega/Theta risks in terms of their proportionality impacting the Theoretical Price of specific strikes making up the construction of a spread.18  Models and the Real World. Addresses the weaknesses of these core assumptions used in a traditional pricing model: 1. Markets are not frictionless: buying/selling an underlying contract has restrictions in terms of tax implications, limitation on funding and transaction costs. 2. Interest rates are variable, not constant over the option&#8217;s life. 3. Volatilty is variable, not constant over the options&#8217; life. 4. Trading is not continous 24/7 &#8211; there are exchange holidays resulting in gaps in price changes.  5. Volatility is linked to Theoretical Price of the underlying contract, not independent of it. 6. Percentage of price changes in an underlying contract does not result in a lognormal distribution  of underlying prices at distribution due to Skew &amp; Kurtosis.To conclude, reading these chapters is not academic. Understanding techniques discussed in the chapters must enable you to answer the following key questions.  In the total inventory of your trading account, if you are … </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hedgingoptions.net/options-trading-strategies-book-review-sheldon-natenberg-option-volatility-and-pricing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Binary Options Trading &#8211; Turn Tiny Trades into Big Profits</title>
		<link>http://hedgingoptions.net/binary-options-trading-turn-tiny-trades-into-big-profits</link>
		<comments>http://hedgingoptions.net/binary-options-trading-turn-tiny-trades-into-big-profits#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binary Option Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binary Options Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Explain Options Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Trade Options]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hedgingoptions.net/binary-options-trading-turn-tiny-trades-into-big-profits</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The amazing new field of binary options trading is helping small capital investors turn a couple of tiny little $200 trades into $300/day trading profits.  The risks are high, but new strategies are evolving daily to mitigate some of those risks. 
Binary options trading is an exciting emerging field in the world of investing. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amazing new field of binary options trading is helping small capital investors turn a couple of tiny little $200 trades into $300/day trading profits.  The risks are high, but new strategies are evolving daily to mitigate some of those risks. </p>
<p>Binary options trading is an exciting emerging field in the world of investing. As the name implies, there are only two potential outcomes in a binary options trading contract &#8211; win or lose. The way most contracts are structured there is a fixed payout for win (typically 75% profit plus return of initial investment), while the lose payout is typically around a 15% return of capital. Maybe a few numbers would help. </p>
<p>A successful $200 trade in a binary options trading contract would pay $350 ($200 initial investment plus 75% profit), while an unsuccessful trade might pay $30 (15% of the original $200 investment). It does seem strange to receive a return of some capital on an incorrect action, but that helps make the market work &#8211; and really creates some interesting hedging opportunities. It&#8217;s almost like getting a &#8216;parting gift&#8217; on a game show, no? </p>
<p>There are some limitations on the available opportunities to participate in this market, as there presently aren&#8217;t a wide variety of securities traded on it. On the other hand, those few securities which are traded on the binary options trading markets are extremely well known, highly liquid securities such as the US Dollar/Yen fx rate, Google, Nasdaq Index, and Microsoft. </p>
<p>One great aspect of this type of investment is the quick turnover rate of investments. Options expire hourly, meaning your investment payoff occurs within the same day &#8211; rather than the weeks, months, and years it may take to see a return in other forms of investments. </p>
<p>Another really great aspect of this emerging market is the low barriers to entry. It only takes $100 to open account &#8211; a stark comparison to the ten thousand dollars needed to open a traditional options account with your regular brokerage. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hedgingoptions.net/binary-options-trading-turn-tiny-trades-into-big-profits/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

